April 29, 2008 11:06 PM UTC

Terry Kunkel's Response

• 0 Comments
• by: TerryK

(I’m promoting this so everyone can see who Terry Kunkel is and what she thinks about all of us. – promoted by Haners)

First, let me start out my response to this blog by saying that I believe blogging is worthless.  If you can’t put your name to something you have to say, then you are a coward and as far as I’m concerned you have no character or integrity.  It’s easy to make comments, whether they are true or not, when you don’t have to face the person you are disparaging.  It takes guts to do that.  Personally, I don’t waste my time and read this drivel. You should get a life if this is all you have to do with your time!

That being said, I will respond to “GOPpundit” and tell you (and apparently the current officers and Nathan Fisk, since you say you met with them and they told you all of this) that you don’t know what you’re talking about with regards to the “$10,000” owed to the former chairman of the EPCR.  At several Executive Committee meetings there was discussion about how to pay back this debt.  At one meeting, I gave the Executive Committee the option to pay off the entire $9,010.00 all at once.  Vicki Broerman and Judith Jurgensen both said “no” because they wanted the money to be put toward getting candidates elected.  The vote then came down that we would not pay off the debt.  Before I left office in February 2007, the Executive Committee finally voted to draft a note and make monthly payments to the former chairman.  

As far as paying an Executive Director, I don’t really care if that’s what they want to do.  But, the one thing I do care about is, if you’re going to pay someone, Mr. Garcia, to be your Executive Director, perhaps that person should know what they’re doing so they can make sure you are doing things according to the Bylaws, etc.  Isn’t that their job?  If they’re being paid to do something else, then call them what they are.  The buck stops with the chairman no matter who’s doing the work.

Next, “coloradoconservative”–you have no idea what you’re talking about regarding the primary election night in 2006.  At that time, I WAS supporting Jeff Crank and was disappointed that he lost (you should get your facts straight before you start “blabbing”).  Now I’m glad that Jeff did lose.  I believe he is a total politician and wants to be a Congressman so bad he can’t stand it.  Jeff says he believes in conservative ideals but wants to unseat one of the most conservative Representatives in Congress.  How would Jeff have voted differently?  If his votes would have been opposite, then Jeff definitely is not the guy for me!  Actually, it sounds like Doug Lamborn should be Jeff Crank’s choice!

I will do all I can to get Doug Lamborn re-elected.  He has gone to Congress and done everything he said he would do.  If the shoe was on the other foot, Jeff Crank would be so angry that someone was putting him through a primary and would be asking why are they doing this.

Well, that’s it!  You won’t be hearing from me anytime soon.  Just wanted to go on the record.  If you want to verify what I’ve said, then check out the past records at HQ (or have they conveniently been shredded or magically disappeared).  Obviously, all of you “regular” bloggers will continue distoring the truth and nothing can be done about that.  But, if you have any guts at all, you’ll put your name to what you say.  Come on–make my day!